☮️How not to Spam?
This page explains how not to spam the public forums of the Open Constitution Network, which covers the community members' subscribed activities.
In theory, the Muellners Foundation explicitly defines a human existential organisation. The Open Constitution Network promotes the sustainable conservation of human sentience. Any political or religious construct shapes human cognition, yet not entirely on its own. Human curiosity and its ability to organise collective sentience have led to different forms of political or religious constructs, all existing at the same time. Existential is a larger construct than any given political or religious construct.
The Foundation shall therefore remain a neutral advocacy group, for subjects which are contextual to political, or religious themes in nature. Muellners Foundation is an apolitical and non-religious organisation.
Read more about Network's Guiding Principles
Following guidelines shall be observed by members, to avoid spam, hate messages, and polarising views in the member space of the network, when covering a subject, including those which are on the list of "sensitivity".
This applies to text messages, video, and audio feeds in the Foundation's communications system & other Internet-based forums of the Foundation (both public and private communications between peers).
Use a more positive and assertive tone in your posts.
When making a reference to any human, including a person outside the Foundation's current membership purview, members shall cite a public-facing record from a verifiable source of information.
Members shall not use the Foundation's space or forums to advocate their religious and political beliefs. A general debate or discussion should be welcome in the Foundation's community, within the Foundation's guiding principles and Code.
A member shall post open and empathetic messages. A member should strive to cite public-facing information, to create visibility and clarity on what the member is wishing to express within the community. A member shall not post a speculative message on any public forum of the Foundation.
A member shall not characterize or refer to another peer directly or indirectly, with any adjective on a public forum of the Foundation.
A good idea is to be responsible with the use of words, in a multi-time zone and multi-cultural global community.
When a member posts a new thread or a subject for discussion, the member shall take due care in citing any publicly identifiable or notable human, corporation or entity such as government, government agencies, inter-governmental agencies, stock exchange listed public corporations.
Special care must be given to posting critical views about Heads of Member States of the United Nations.
It is recommended that you shall cite the public office that the referenced human holds in the government, or inter-governmental agencies instead of the human themselves.
In the Foundation's community, we celebrate and criticize ideas not the person behind the ideas.
Community members do this for a few reasons:
a. To initiate a reform dialogue with the concerned public office.
b. To protect the reputation and goals of the Foundation, in a manner which is consistent with its not-for-profit status. Remember we are an association, not a rebellion.
c. To protect the privacy of the human and maintain a neutral sensitivity towards the human(named in the public conversation).
8. Members shall assert their views in a parliamentary manner.
9. A member shall not post any messages about their own "For Profit" work, and if a member is asked to stop by the Moderators, then the member shall stop. Please read about the Self and Peer Review here.
Community members may introduce their initiatives to their peers and it shall then be the peers who may introduce the initiatives upon their own review. A member should refrain from posting about their own "for profit" activity, on the public forums of the Muellners Foundation.
How to express yourself in a polarised world?
Members shall express and debate over human society issues within the guiding principles of the Foundation. These issues may cover governmental decisions or governance issues, subjects of Freedom of Speech on the Internet & censorship, technology governance etc.
Read the list of "Sensitivity" here.
Members shall express their views in an open, empathetic and non-speculative manner.
Members shall always strive to cover opposing views in their arguments to avoid polarising conversations and avoid the spread of misinformation.
While these are loosely defined guidelines and are regularly updated, the Foundation's volunteers shall moderate the community conversations.
Please read the Foundation's Moderation Guidelines here.
Spamming(in this article) encompasses all forms of communications taking place on the public forums of the Foundation, not just text messages.
Last updated
